The Filter^ REVIEW

My Photo

The Filter^ REVIEW

  • Introduction^
  • Directory^

Recent Posts

  • Speaking in Tongues
  • Arcadia
  • The Winters Tale
  • The Cherry Orchard
  • The Marriage & La cambiale di matrimonio
  • Winter-Spring at English National Opera
  • Götterdämmerung, Hallé/Mark Elder, 9-10.5.09
  • Ivanov
  • Der Blumenstrauss, Basel Martinu Festival
  • Some Orchestras

Sponsor:


Subscribe to this blog's feed
Blog powered by TypePad

Speaking in Tongues

Duke of York's Theatre, 6th October 2009

You know you've made it as a theatre critic when you walk through the doors and are met by an usher who says "Dr & Mrs Evans, we have upgraded your seats to the Royal Circle". Then, alas, the combination of a half-empty theatre and credit card technology makes you realise that your £10 a pop "restricted view" tickets have merely hit the jackpot. 

The Duke of York's have been putting on decent, affordable, plays for some time, demonstrating that the traditional downplaying of the "West End" as little more than musicals and cameos is a caricature. Speaking in Tongues comes from Austrialian writer Andrew Bovell and is, in a word, "intricate". The use of video gives it a glossy, cinematic feel that sits well with it being comfortably within the genre of a "thriller". It opens with two pairs of adulterers wrestling with the guilt (and uneasiness) of their actions, their dialogue interwoven. The use of echoes and (apologies for not knowing the right word for this) the-finishing-of-each-others-sentences reminds you that this is a play, and must be a play, and lays a foundation for the interwoven plotlines.

All four actors where terrific, and the reason I noticed the play in the first place - John Simm - touched upon both the plucky, flawed nature of Danny Kavanagh ('The Lakes') and the cynical detective Sam Tyler ('Life on Mars'). The small, intimate cast, switching between characters, held the complex play together well, and despite the nihilistic and punishing (and at times quite terrifying) themes it was an engrossing evening.

11.10.2009 in Theatre | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Arcadia

Duke of York's Theatre, 24th July 2009
The only other production of 'Arcadia' that I've seen was staged in a small Oxford playhouse with a distinctly AmDram feel. It was about 10 years ago and a school friend shouted "poor" in judgment of the actor playing Bernard Nightingale. That incident lived with me as a testing ground for how an audience should behave, and the production lived me with me as a testimony to the brilliance of Tom Stoppard.
'Arcadia' is decidedly AmDram. Whilst it has its share of poignancy it is above all else a vehicle for some fantastic dialogue. The fact that Stoppard decorates that vehicle with so much intellectual commentary (e.g. chaos theory, Fermat's Last Theorem, landscape gardening, romanticism, modernism, leave anything i've missed out in the comments...) shouldn't detract from the accesibility of the piece. It is barnstorming, and watching it performed really makes you realise that.
As is likely the case Samantha Bond's version of Hannah Jarvis was too shrieky and het up. If that sounds misogynistic it probably is, but Lady Croom (played by Nancy Carroll) is supposed to be over the top, but did it without grating. Indeed she was brilliant, as was the perfect comic delivery by George Pott's Ezra Chater. My only frustration with this play is that the protagonist - Thomasina Coverly - is such a precocious, annoying person. It's unavoidable, but it's hard to enjoy watching her on stage. Especially in light of the eerie finale, this is a pity.
Performances like this make me realise why I enjoy theatre. It's not because I feel I have anything meaningful to contribute, or even a desire to be seen as anything other than a naive and unsophisticated philistine. But it's just good fun. It makes you think, it makes you laugh, and - with an appropriate pause at the end - it makes you clap.

27.07.2009 in Theatre | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

The Winters Tale

The Old Vic, 1st July 2009
Surely the finest stage direction in the history of theatre (and possibly the most famous too) is

Exit, pursued by a bear

I confess to being a little vulgar, and in the same way that you can infer the quality of a curry house by its lime pickle, this stage direction can (for me) make or break a production. Sam Mendes went for comedy, as a large (incredible) bear walked behind Antigonus and just as the seasoned South Bank audience couldn't suppress a pantomime style "it's behind you" any longer a crack of thunder shook the stage. Afterward we debated whether the stage direction actually took place (or whether the thunder represented the end of the section), but it was all jolly good fun.
'The Winter's Tale', in essense, is about the sublime juxtaposition of fun on the one hand (genuine, country-dancing, rollicking fun) and the deepest, darkest depths of despair that simmer before erupting. The way Mendes coped with the seemingly inexplicable was fantastic. The lighting alluded to Leontes imagining his wife's misdemeaners, and these dream-like sequences lended plausibiilty to a fundamentally implausible play, (whilst I have reservations about the range of Simon Russell Beale this is one of the most believable Leonte's you'll see). And whilst I think the play can be staged without resorting to magic, the use of real magic to reveal the message from the oracle provided coherency . As ever the issue of Mamillius rested uneasily (we're not supposed to have forgotten about him at the end), but there's such a range within the work I imagine the actors love it.
As part of 'The Bridge Project' the ensemble blended British theatre royalty with American populism, but I can't help feeling that the same cast simultaneously appearing in too such different plays doesn't work. Ethan Hunt Hawke [thanks Mandy] has greater stage presense than I'd feared, and gave a resounding performance (although he played Autolycous a little too sinister for my taste), and the casting split the English and US actors in a fluent manner (indeed the set design "bridged" the production as well). However the character of Hermione should be, above all, stoic, and the elegance and poise on show exposed the youth of the actress. I know the 'The Bridge Project' is more than a gimmick, but I can't help feeling that the same cast was a disadvantage. Finally, a minor quibble: "At my request he would not" should not be funny. It's frightening.

27.07.2009 in Theatre | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

The Cherry Orchard

Radlett Arts Centre, Thursday 19th March
The Old Vic, Wednesday 17th June

This is a little harsh, I know, but given that I've seen two different productions of Checkov's 'The Cherry Orchard' within the space of a few months, I've decided to write a joint review. The first was an "AmDram" (at least I assume it was) travesty at our local arts centre. The second was a Hollywood gilded triumph on the South Bank. Contrasts abound.
Kevin Spacey is currently advertising American Airlines, claiming that it's hard to define what constitutes a "good" seat, but that you know it when you find it. In Radlett, we spent the second half in the dead centre of the single tiered-raked seating. These would be the most expensive seats in any theatre, and the "sweet spot" that most actors tend to deliver to. As regular followers will know by know, I am not a fan of this style of acting, believing that it's the role of a decent actor (and indeed producer) to forge an individual contract with each member of the audience. We are not an "audience", we are a collection of participants. But on paper, we had the best view in the house.
By contrast, regardless of where the "best" seats at the Old Vic are, the "worst" are almost certainly P5 and P6 in the Lylian Baylis Upper Circle. The Old Vic arches in not so much an Upper "Circle", but a rectangle. Consequently unless you are in the centre of the seating you will be facing the opposite side of the audience, not the stage. Indeed 5 and 6 are the first seats in the back row (closest to the stage), so you are sat perpindicular to the stage and so high up you can only make out about two thirds of it. As I reminded Faith, this was why the tickets are only £10 (and they are clearly advertised as restricted view), so I don't have a problem. Indeed my philosophy is that I'd rather watch 4 shows with a craning neck than 1 show in the plum centre. Yes, I can't see all the action, but I've paid 30 quid less than you and you. So, on paper, the worst view in the house.

But the "view" is misleading, because we don't come to theatre to watch. If we did, we'd buy it on DVD. Complaining about the "view" is like being at Goodison Park next to someone whingeing that you can't see the far corner spot. If you want a perfect view from the half way line, watch it on Sky. The reason we turn up is precisely to crane our necks, miss some of the action and be too close to others - to let people piss in our back trouser pocket and vomit up a three week old meat pie. In footie, in theatre.

Indeed the seats at the Vic were infinitely "better" than the ones in Radlett, because they were (i) cheaper; (ii) at a decent performance. In Radlett, I was thinking that an even better seat would be one at the bar. At the Old Vic, I wouldn't have been anywhere else. And this is the point. You don't need to see everything to experience it. You don't need to be plum centre to appreciate the quality of the performance. It's priggish to think otherwise.

Now to the performances. I think a simple rule of theatre should be that accents match costumes. There's nothing wrong with taking a play and putting it into a different context. One of the best productions of 'The Winter's Tale' was a Russian one, in Russian (but not in Russia). Mamillius looked like Alexei, which was haunting. But if a play is set in the set period, and actors dress accordingly, why are their accents allowed to stand as anachronisms? Not only this, but they put on fake accents that aren't of the period! As an example, both the servents in both productions spoke with Cockney accents. Yes, I get that they're staff, and yes, in the UK that accent signals such. But this isn't set in Victorian England. At least Hollywood dresses up language as much as the costumes. It's a pet hate of mine - Cockneys in theatre. Silly stuff.

It was engaging to see true theatre so soon after a local production. My biggest pet hate of theatre is actors who over act. Those who are almost shouting out I AM CURRENTLY DOING SOME ACTING. I SPEAK IN A WAY THAT SHOWS I AM ACTING. LOOK AT MY ACTING. I AM AN ACTOR. But even though the West End and South Bank routinely throws up some PROPER ACTING (as opposed to some being, and some engagement) it doesn't grate as much as provincial towns that seek to fit into a middle class and under-experienced audience's conception of what acting should look like. The Radlett performance contained no real depth of character, and whilst I assume Ranevskaya was supposed to be comic she appeared more like a hysterical drag artist. I kept expecting here to shreik "I'm a lady!", which I don't think Checkov had in mind when he wrote this as a comedy. It was an erratic performance with a small cast that went through the motions without really delivering something tremarkable.

By contrast Sam Mendes did a terrific job. As ever Simon Russell-Beale exuded stagemenship and compassion. I think he went overboard on the triumphalism of the final scene (surely the events give sufficient dramatic power). The cast was well balanced and Tom Stoppard didn't seem to innovate too much with the translation. That said, I'm not skilled enough to comment critically on the script or even the acting. All I can do is say whether the actors spoke to me. And they did

28.06.2009 in Theatre | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

The Marriage & La cambiale di matrimonio

Silk Street Theatre, Guildhall School of Music and Drama, 3.6.09

These two rare one-act tales of nuptial shenanigans by Bohuslav Martinů and Gioachino Rossini probably fall just short of the label ‘miniature masterpieces’. But their respective productions at the Guildhall School invested them with more thought, commitment and dramatic vision than some professional opera companies would works of repertoire status. The results are refreshing, lively and surely the most ringing endorsement of their creations the two composers could have wished for. 

And Bohuslav Martinů would have been wishing for a long time: his 1952 television opera The Marriage is receiving its first UK performance here. The Gogol-based libretto has some wry (and some dated) observations and is effectively and cleverly framed here by moving small-screen-size prosceniums. These frame the tale of government official Podkolyosin – suavely played in grey Gogolian dramatic hues but a naturally warm baritone by Duncan Rock – and the gaggle of ne’er-do-wells who involve themselves in his attempts to win a bride. The most complete performance comes from Emily Steventon as the matchmaker Fyokla. She is dramatically malleable and invests her voice with character, too. Tenor Nicky Spence as Kochkaryov has a rich and impressive voice that’s one-size bigger, but his larger-than-life portrayal is occasionally at odds with the dramatic contours of the production, despite his highly developed stagecraft.

Immediately striking in this piece is the quality of orchestral playing under Clive Timms. The student orchestra’s strings despatch layers of rich, wooden tone, while on the outer edges Martinů’s distinctive lunges into piano-panic and timpani-tantrums are spirited and confident. When Podkolyosin rapturously proclaims his love at the work’s dramatic apex, the lyrical unity of players and singer is nailed.

The directorial vision bestowed upon Rossini’s one-act farce La cambiale di matrimonio by Alessandro Talevi is extraordinarily astute, imaginative and visionary for a production in a student theatre. Rossini’s tale of a financially arranged marriage threatening to break the heart of two young lovers was transported to a seedy lap-dancing club. The orchestra launched into Rossini’s overture with Classical poise but great energy, accompanied by a partially visible dance routine that could so easily have worn thin at the recapitulation. It didn’t, and that set the tone for the rest of the production.

Characterisation here is a level deeper than in the Martinů, and you could feel – as in the best productions – a sense of belief in the dramatic vision that drew the best from the cast. Outstanding was Derek Welton as the oppressive father; his elastic, chocolatey baritone never faltered (except when he meant it to), while his overall performance would have impressed on the professional opera stage. He was supported by the developing yet impressive coloratura of soprano Rebecca van den Burgh who committed all to the role, and some amusing puppyish antics from her non-financial love interest played by Carlos Nogueira. Though some of the tongue-in-cheek dance movements admittedly wore a little thin and nearly grated against the effortless élan of Rossini’s music, this production’s eye for detail and imagination propelled it forward. The ensemble piece mid-way through was a fine company achievement and highlighted vocal sensitivity as well as flair. All in all, the sort of entertainment you wouldn’t mind paying Covent Garden prices for.

Andrew Mellor

05.06.2009 in Opera | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Winter-Spring at English National Opera

English National Opera’s line-up from January has been, on paper, one of the strongest in the company’s history. Press night for Jonathan Miller’s new production of Puccini’s La bohème was cancelled because London lay under eight inches of snow; that cranked up the tension on this show’s two big questions: would Miller’s production justify the unusual hype, and would crossover-dabbling Alfie Boe cut the mustard as the piece’s star tenor?

The short answers are no and no. But perhaps not quite and not quite would be a little fairer. The production’s biggest success was its Act II, suavely played against a busy restaurant scene in which Puccini’s everything-but-the-kitchen-sink crescendo somehow achieved focus and clarity whilst building with patient momentum. In the opera’s opening and closing scenes the action was confined to a small and distant-seeming loft; it might have worked well for Sky TV’s live relay, but it was a strain for much of the live audience sat in London’s biggest theatre. It drew some clichéd backslapping from the bohemians in the opening scene, too, but – if you watched very carefully – it effectively framed the still, aching drama of the opera’s final moments.

Alfie Boe’s Rodolfo was decently crafted, but his voice appeared forced as some of Puccini’s melodic arcs reached their apex. Sometimes it attractively reflected the struggle of daily life for the bohemians, the rest of the time it just felt awkward. Melody Moore was a decent if less dramatically convincing Mimi; Hanan Alattar was a vivid and stylish Musetta and Pauls Putnins was a rather wooden Colline. Roland Wood as Marcello offered the most rounded and moving individual performance of all, whilst the sometimes ropy ENO orchestra played with rich, languid warmth under Miguel Harth-Bedoya.

Some weeks later John Adams was in town to witness the first UK performance of his 2005 opera about the testing of the atomic bomb, Doctor Atomic. After The Death of Klinghoffer and The Flowering Tree, this piece is something of a return to the news-reel style of Adams’s first opera Nixon in China – in terms of both dramatic architecture and musical language. Based on true events, the opera’s simply narrative unfolds straightforwardly while individual characters indulge in periods of reflective analysis, personal revelation or blissful romance.

Like Nixon, the music is difficult to play and sing well, and the ENO orchestra and chorus struggled a little in the works striking opening number – a classic post-minimalist preface, moving through Adamsian modulations in a steady pulse and occasionally attractively irregular metre. Making this music sound clean and organic is hard. As it progressed, though, the score was well shaped by the orchestra and chorus under conductor Lawrence Renes. The storm interlude – with echoes of that from Britten’s Peter Grimes – was riveting; the musical performance expunged even the trigger-happy poking of a button marked ‘lightning’ somewhere in the Coliseum’s technical box.

In the title role, Gerald Finley gave one of the most observed and beautiful performances to have graced ENO’s stage in recent years. His movement was minimal: Oppenheimer, the artistically sensitive, morally troubled but scientifically driven project director, came alive in Finley’s eyes, his feet, the slight movements of his neck, his changing grip on a cigarette. The now-famous monologue Batter my heart, a cascading D-minor setting of John Donne’s sonnet, was immensely powerful: Finley hardly moved, but flooded the stage with conviction. His rounded but edgy baritone – powerful and malleable – was full of earnest, and flecked with an effective American twang.

Adams’s shapely and clear vocal writing seems a touch more at ease with the idiom than that of Nixon; his orchestration has more bite and purposefully less sheen, his harmonic range is wider, and his composer’s eye demonstrates, perhaps, a keener sense of dramatic architecture. As a piece of drama Doctor Atomic feels concise, effective and stamped through with the Adams-Sellars hallmark. Penny Woolcock’s production addresses all the piece’s major observations, chief amongst them the obvious dichotomy of inspired human teamwork dedicated to destroying human life. The only let-down, then, is the work’s ending. It seemed simply to fizzle out – rained off by a sense of confusion and the mal-handling of the dramatic apex. The watchful gaze of the entire cast from the front of the stage was effective, but the ghostly voices that flood the auditorium at the opera’s dying moments debase the previous three hours of music and sound like a crass cop out.

What total contrast, then, to the devastating final moments of David Alden’s moving production of Janáček’s Jenůfa – but we largely knew that would be the case since the production first appeared in 2006 (and bagged two Oliviers). Despite this, the performance on 12 March wasn’t without its problems. Janáček’s orchestra is the major non-human protagonist of this piece, and the two electrifying, timpani-battered orchestral outbursts that end Acts I and II didn’t ignite as they could have. Amanda Roocroft in the title role gave her all in capturing Jenůfa’s tempting innocence in the opera’s first half, her isolated desperation (bordering on madness) in the second and her emotionally fatigued acceptance at the end, but her voice sometimes felt bloated and uncontrolled. All in all, this was a vocally uneven Jenůfa.

Robert Brubaker and Tom Randle as Laca and Steva, however, were vocally sound and dramatically superb. The former’s attractive but occasionally strained voice in this case only reflected his character’s inadequacies: here was a man who could never be where he wanted to be. Against Alden’s vision of a deprived but traditional industrial Eastern European community, his predicament gained a tearing loneliness. Acute and moving touches and details in choreography and design threw the work’s despair and pain into even sharper focus.

Detail is what you get, too, from the same director’s production of Britten’s Peter Grimes, which opened on 9 May. Much anticipated was this production, and with good reason. In it Alden invests huge thought in each of the Borough’s sometimes extraneous characters. The landlady Auntie becomes a Stephen King style mistress of ceremonies with masochist undertones; the apothecary Ned Keene is a sex-obsessed creep; the preacher Bob Boles is a crank dragged up from an age whose values have long been abandoned; the two nieces are deeply disturbed human beings whose mental programming is rapidly unravelling – heads lopsided, eyes glazed, cut off from the world by a repertoire of bizarre, unsettling physical gestures. Welcome to the seaside village of the damned: you know from the off that Grimes isn’t going to get out of this place alive, and for that, you’ll forgive him almost anything.

Individual performances have extreme conviction whilst the orchestral playing and chorus singing under Edward Gardner surpasses anything heard at the Coliseum this season. The strength of Alden’s vision, though, has its downsides. The quartet at the end of the Second Act’s first scene feels emotionally bankrupt – we know the nieces incapable of sincere rational thought, and it’s hard to imagine Alden’s sinister Auntie having any empathy with Ellen. Grimes’s haymaking thwack on Ellen upon her proclamation that ‘we’ve failed’ suggests an angry, forceful man; Stuart Skelton’s portrayal of a cowardly, twitching descent into mad paranoia in the closing minutes belongs to a different Grimes. The Australian tenor is, though, vocally excellent.

It was Captain Balstrode whose individual presence is felt most keenly in this Grimes. Gerald Finley’s portrayal is full of nuance and suggestion; he appears not afraid or overly critical of the Borough’s unsettling blindness and ineptitude, but simply weary of its incessant delusion. He feels like a sidelined moral compass, hopelessly attempting to reason with the unreasonable. His baritone’s bluesy edge and his tired, lolling stance conjure a character of great depth and decency (there was even a suggested romance with Ellen). Yet still he’s controlling; he forms the pivot of the three roles – with Grimes and Ellen – that Alden appears to play ‘straight’. If there is any philosophical doubt in Alden’s vision, perhaps it’s here. The Borough’s array of freaks and deviants are so far removed that it's hard to imagine yourself as one of them; there isn’t the probing self-questioning and moral crisis of individuality that this opera often prompts – it’s simply the con-artists versus the normal folk. But in the conviction of its delivery, Britten’s work doesn’t come over any less moving.

Peter Grimes is in repertory until 30 May.

Andrew Mellor

27.05.2009 in Opera | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Götterdämmerung, Hallé/Mark Elder, 9-10.5.09

In his platform preface Mark Elder spoke of the penetrative stare of Wotan and the timeless flow of the Rhine before this ambitious concert performance of the concluding chapter to Wagner’s Ring cycle. And it was the ingraining of these ideals in the orchestral playing that most impressed about the performance: the Wagnerian churn and bite was confident and accomplished, and there were corners in which Wagner’s moments of extraordinary transition were given unusual space to breath, like the inexorable but unpredictable flow of the Rhine itself.

On Saturday though, for the Prologue and Act I, the Hallé players seemed a little daunted by the work’s scale: a number of brass instruments were prone to over-blowing; some of the more translucent textures were off-balance and there were moments of rickety tuning. But that had all changed by Sunday evening for Acts II & III. The playing was now brooding and knowing, instruments recalling themes from the first three operas as if they were instinctively remembering them – even if nobody got round to tuning the lower timpani.

Still, Saturday’s prologue unfurled magnificently. This is Wagner’s orchestra prizing open a gargantuan can of worms: Erda’s three daughters, the Norns, dredge up events from the Ring’s first three operas and glimpse what might be to come. But when the Third Norn Miranda Keys overshot her big moment, it, too, proved a prophecy: Katarina Dalayman’s Brünnhilde was wonderfully committed, but she was prone to over singing in her middle register as the orchestral ocean swelled behind her, and in The Bridgewater Hall’s cauldron acoustic, some of her big moments boomed brashly.

Dalayman’s fellow countryman Lars Cleveman makes a convincing Siegfried given the just-shy-of-Wagnerian size of his voice. His conviction lay in his smiling naivety; he exuded love-struck excitedness and confidence, though his woodbird of Act III could have done with less brawn and more tweet (the Hallé’s delicate principal clarinet and oboe compensated). But as the weekend progressed, both Cleveman and Dalayman grew into their roles. The latter’s immolation scene was tantalising; she gave it her all, controlled the acceptant rage more carefully and achieved aching pain. Her voice has the weighty darkness of a warrior; by the end, nothing was going to get in her way of her vision of Brünnhilde, not even the occasional vocal strain. 

As Götterdämmerung pivots on the plotting of the Gibichungs, so, vocally, did this performance. Peter Coleman-Wright was a suave, mannered Gunther, perfectly understood and delivered with a warm, almost Sinatra-like ease. Nancy Gustafson as his sister Gutrune played up to Siegfried’s boyish quests for love with a stylish and beautiful purity. It was Attlia Jun’s Hagen, though, who created most of the weekend’s electricity. His voice is extraordinary: ultra-powerful, but more chocolate than concrete. That vocal deliciousness didn’t curb his evil, either. When he summoned the Gibichung hoards –blisteringly but impeccably sung by the combined forces of the Royal Opera, London Symphony and Hallé Choruses – you felt the weight of control with which his character steers the plot. Hagen does, after all, get the Ring’s last word.

It seems an irony that given Wagner’s belief in the equality of all the artistic components of opera, a piece like Götterdämmerung stands so well in concert. In it is contained some of the most extraordinary and ear-bending orchestration in all music. Elder knows it: his vision of the work had more dramatic conviction without staging than many a full production (we could have done without pre-concert jibe at ‘ghastly modern productions’, though, and the tweed-clad applause that greeted it). As this two-evening performance progressed – one of the most ambitious promotions in the Hallé’s history – the orchestra increasingly embodied and projected the narrative. Like a scaling of Valkyries’ rock, it wasn’t easy, but it ended in heroic triumph. While some great unsung artists will be remembered in Manchester, this wasn’t really anyone’s Götterdämmerung but the Hallé’s and Elder’s. Perhaps that’s why the loyal audience met it with such astounding ovations.

Andrew Mellor

10.05.2009 in Opera | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Ivanov

27.11.08, Wyndham's Theatre

Not since my English A-levels had I seen a play so soon after reading it. I had become used to watching performances based on plots that I'm barely familiar with, being introduced to characters for the first time. But this was different. This was a tense and nervous occasion, hoping that the event would do justice to a work that I am deeply fond of. I read the short, symmetrical play on a flight back from Belgrade which I think is the perfect context. Nikolai Ivanov is an unpleasant but morally ambiguous anti-hero. Belgrade is a city where pragmatism reigns, built on such convoluted history we can barely distinguish the heroes from the villains. In both cases our intellect revolts in a fit of misunderstanding, and despite feeling ethically repulsed we're left with infatuation, and an sincere emotional bond.

I was looking forward to this play as soon as I heard about the Donmar's much-trumpeted residency at Wyndham's Theatre, but was late getting organised. In the end I secured the very last ticket, on the very last night of the run. I suppose it makes sense to watch this play alone - it isn't light entertainment, it isn't trivial. You need to invest in it, need to believe in it, and it was fitting that I jumped onto a train in the pissing gloom of late November, grumpy after watching a meak Australian display in the Rugby, ready to see how this would go.

Ivanov is an arl arse. Grumpy, gloomy, wracked with guilt about his own disatisfaction with life and his inability to do anything about it. His farming efforts have failed. He owes money to his neighbour and is surrounded by people he loathes. He's fallen out of love with his wife and with himself. Remnants of a once proud, ambitious hero lie shattered as he stumbles through sheer existence. We are introduced to him with a gun shot fired by the irritating schemer Borkin, the manager of the Ivanov estate. The real meat of the play are the relationships that Ivanov has despite longing for solitude. He is so unmoved by his wife, Anna, he can barely communicate with her. She sacrificed her faith (and thus her dowry) to marry Ivanov, and is now dying from TB. Ivanov lacks the financial resources to send her to the Crimea, or the emotional resources to comfort her. As rumours fly about his original motives the young Sasha (daughter of Ivanov's creditor) declares her love for him, or rather her love for who he used to be and her confidence that she can rescue him. Just as Ivnov dares to dream that he's found his energy, Anna arrives.

Amidst this turmoil, the only voice of certainty is Anna's doctor, Lvov, unafraid to denounce Ivanov at every opportunity. He is appalled to think that Ivanov's past and prospective marriages are fuelled by pecuniary motives, and even more revulsed when he realises that this is a commonly held belief. Amidst the mud slinging, rumours and accusations Ivanov remains stoic, repeating that he's never lied. The play leapt to life in the exchanges between Kenneth Branagh (Ivanov) and Tom Hiddleston (Lvov). The former believes in the integrity of honesty, the latter rejoicing in the assertion of his own moral superiority. The man who speaks most about morals, sees morals so clearly, so willing to accuse others of moral bankruptcy, turns into a farce, and we're forced to feel sympathy for the broken man who sees the world as it truly is.

Throughout Branagh was outstanding, and it was a treat to watch. The play gave plenty of opportunity for him to demonstrate his genuine talents. This was a blockbuster - Branagh as lead, Stoppard as author, Grandage as director - but it was also formiddable quality. There is a real challange to bring Ivanov to life on stage, to get across such internal misery and despondency whilst still being the lead and having to make oneself heard. The assembly pulled it off, with busy and entertainting scenes involving the extended cast to complement Ivanov's soliloquoys and pounding dialogues. This culminated majestically in the final scene. Ivanov cannot bear being in the company of multiple people and stands uneasily. Whereas in Act II he finds comfort in the guitar (a wonderful use of the Russian role for folk), in Act IV a cello case lies empty - part symbolising the lost duets from earlier in the play, part symbolising that Ivanov is beyond escape. When he finally gives up, the play concludes with a wonderfully subdued yet blistering end. Standing ovation. Thrilling.

There is always a danger that something so ambitious doesn't quite become the sum of its parts, and there were certainly a few points of uneasiness. The script played up the wit within the text, and although at times it provided a comic respite by ridiculing Ivanov's frustration with the incestuous and dull monotony of his social circle, there was also a tendency to take bluntly serious (and achingly soulful) laments as light commentary. As ever, the audience seemed intent on extracting humour from the merest offering, possibly even when the delivery commanded sobriety. Although the play was originally intended to be a comedy, I would have preferred the darkness to take priority. There were also a few irritations with the text. I believe Stoppard's intention was to modernise, but why? One of the real joys of reading Checkov is the essentially pre-modern nature of his work (with streams of consciousness and intellectualisation etc), and there is a wealth of decent translations in existence. Yet at times (and I'm not a linguist so this is just a general feeling) sentences seemed clumsily modern, references seemed anachronistic, or simply out of context. This was all the more evident in contrast to the set design, perfectly faithful to the original - this wasn't (and shouldn't have been) a modern revival. It was (and should be) the triumphant demonstration that top quality theatre can be financially viable in the heart of the West End. More praise for the Donmar, for implementing a vision of what theatre should be.

30.11.2008 in Theatre | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Der Blumenstrauss, Basel Martinu Festival

9.11.08, Elisabethenkirche, Basel, Switzerland

The first concert of Basel’s latest annual celebration of Czech composer Bohuslav Martinů presented a rare and fascinating chance to hear Der Blumenstrauss (‘The Bouquet of Flowers’), the composer’s 1937 cycle of folk texts for vocal soloists, choir, children’s choir and orchestra. The piece is fascinating but hardly ever heard; there’s only one poorly captured recording in the catalogue. As the assembled forces at Basel’s Elizabethenkirche dug vigorously into Martinů’s angular, brittle score, it wasn’t hard to see the main reason for Der Blumenstrauss’ neglect: it’s fiendishly difficult.

And those assembled forces were a mixed bag. If Basel’s famous for one thing, musically speaking, it’s the Basel Chamber Orchestra. So where was it? Otherwise engaged, maybe, but one hopes its current form would have produced a better ensemble sound than that of the Ensemble Basilisk, which seemed like it’d been thrown together. In Mozart’s C minor Adagio & Fugue that opened, the strings struggled to tune the more chromatic intervals and scurryings of the fugue. The orchestra faired rather better in the Martinů, rising to the challenge with spirited tutti playing, but the strings again were ragged and underpowered, whilst the timpani cried out to be hit with sharper, thinner sticks to bring out the Janáčekian eccentricity of their frantic salvos.

The overall performance of Der Blumenstrauss was, however, satisfying – due largely to the vocal contributions. The biggest challenges of the piece are handed to the adult chorus, who have to pitch a number of tricky chords from thin air. The Prague Chamber Choir managed that, and also sang with perfect diction and appropriately skewed, jabbing phrasing in Martinů’s more idiosyncratic passages. The tenors and basses produced an effortlessly still pianissimo in the deep, delicate sixth movement ‘His Kind Sweetheart’, which sounds like Martinů-cum-Mussorgsky. Clipped consonants, decent tuning and an appropriately villagey tone were also supplied by the children’s choir SurseeCantorei – though disciplined, they sounded like they were enjoying themselves.

Of four superb soloists, the soprano and mezzo stood out, largely because of the utterly unique, sit-up-and-listen music Martinů gifts them. Again, pitching some of Martinů’s entries is fiendishly difficult; the duet between the two female soloists in the second movement ‘Cowherd Song’ is every bit nature music – an impassioned caterwauling to which the chorus responds with trickily slipping wordless chords – and it had an intense beauty and honesty here, not least in its many music-filled silences. Mezzo Nina Amon was exquisite; her rich voice has a tinge of Slavic sadness which was delivered with passion and honesty.

The Elizabethenkirche is small, boomy and tall, which renders it as unsuitable as can be imagined for Martinů’s fast, rollicking movements; detail, including the tinkling piano part, was all but lost. The experienced Conductor Gerd Albrecht maintained control and initiated decent tempi in these quick movements, but he seemed to do little more in between; there were passages that were crying out to be phrased more keenly or have their rhythms pulled around. His tempi in the slow third movement, ‘Idyll’ – the orchestra-only interlude sometimes plucked out of Der Blumenstrauss and performed as a stand-alone work – was a touch quick, and Martinů’s trademark ‘fallings’ into perfect cadences passed without anything like their implied magic. It’s wonderful to hear a fantastic neglected piece like this at the hands of a modest and intriguing little festival, but you couldn’t help thinking – especially given the capacity audience – that lurking behind this valiant attempt was something of a missed opportunity.

Andrew Mellor

16.11.2008 in Music | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Some Orchestras

Welcome – retrospectively – to the month-long period when the UK benefits from the tail-end of the Proms season and the launch of the domestic orchestral season. Yes, it’s a little crude, but the opportunity for comparison is irresistible. 

New York Philharmonic, Thursday 28 August

One of the Proms’ big attractions was the New York Philharmonic, visiting under Music Director Lorin Maazel. On 28 August Maazel began with a new work by Stephen Stucky, which he seemed to tackle at arms length. Rhapsodies for Orchestra is an attractive piece, and its spasmodic moments of grandeur echoed satisfyingly around the Royal Albert Hall. The building also came into its own during Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring, in which it seemed to trouble the big apple’s percussionists who lagged despite Maazel’s piercing stare and semaphore beat. But Maazel pulled moments of fascinating nuance from some of Stravinsky’s darker corners. Overall though, Maazel’s orchestra impressed most in Gershwin’s Piano Concerto, in which Jean-Yves Thibaudet’s piano was met by a violin sound of extraordinary silky sheen slipperiness rarely heard even from the ensembles who boast that as one of their characteristics. Some of the solo attempts at jazz playing from the brass and woodwind seemed disappointingly…well…un-American.

Oslo Philharmonic Orchestra, Saturday 30 August

A few days later the Oslo Philharmonic Orchestra, another ensemble of fine reputation, was on the same stage under its Principal Conductor the Finn Jukka-Pekka Saraste. Another new work opened; a moving piece of Mahlerian emotional scope from another Finn, the composer Magnus Lindberg. In fact, Seht die Sonne was the highlight. Rachmaninov’s Third Piano Concerto was delicately introduced by the orchestra and Nicolai Lugansky. It continued delicately, too. And finished delicately. There just didn’t seem anything of differing substance in between. Sibelius’ First Symphony came next, the symphony that perhaps seems more immediately Finnish than any of the other six. Saraste’s pace at the opening was quick, which muddied the intricate scales with which the first movement folds outwards. This was a tight performance; too tight for the Royal Albert Hall – at least from where I was sitting. Saraste is back in London this Wednesday (15 October), where he’ll direct the London Philharmonic in the same Rachmaninov concerto and Sibelius’s Fifth; one suspects he’ll please a little more in that hall.
 
Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra, Friday 12 September

Ah for a fine acoustic! It was to Liverpool’s Philharmonic Hall on September 12th for the opening night of the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra’s new season. Vasily Petrenko was joined by local boy and recent Gramophone Record-of-the-Year-winner Paul Lewis for a decent and sensitive Beethoven’s Second Piano Concerto, preceded by a fascinating piece from the pen of another local musician Kenneth Hesketh - Graven Image - premiered by The Phil at the Proms a few weeks earlier. But the main event came after the interval: a blistering account of Prokofiev’s Fifth Symphony that seemed charged by an almost supernatural momentum. Petrenko wringed the broad, searing phrases of the first movement for everything. As the nightmarishly vivid second movement motored to a finish, a collective gasp shuddered through the capacity audience. The orchestra kept something in reserve for a devastating finale, with Petrenko releasing the tension with an astonishing combination of discipline and dramatic intuition. The Phil’s woodwind were collectively superb; its strings energised and virtuosic. The brass just about kept up, too. A very special evening.

Philharmonia Orchestra, Tuesday 23 September

Back to London for the opening of the Philharmonia Orchestra’s new season. This was a special ‘gala’ concert as it formed new Principal Conductor Esa-Pekka Salonen’s first in post, despite his 25-year relationship with the orchestra and a spell as Principal Guest Conductor. The programme had Salonen written all over it – except, perhaps, for the lack of a new work. Bartok’s Miraculous Mandarin snarled wonderfully. Then came Prokofiev’s First Violin Concerto (soloist Vadim Repin) and, after the break, Stravinsky’s opera-oratorio Oedipus Rex. Both are superlatively tough pieces to play, and both were tight, perfectly balanced and pleasingly luminous. Very impressive, yes, but also a little dry; if the Philharmonia bosses were expecting fireworks at the Royal Festival Hall, they would have been disappointed. Still, it’s difficult to find tangible reason for celebration when, as important and visionary a talent Salonen is, he’s effectively been with the orchestra for over two decades. The only excitement lies in the change on the orchestra’s letterhead, and the prospect of some interesting repertoire to come. Watch this space.

Andrew Mellor 

10.10.2008 in Music | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Next »