The Beautiful Game
It's funny reading people coming from a non-football-playing country talking about football (I guess they would've called it soccer instead of football...) Take this, for example:
In soccer, the off-sides [sic!!!] rule...acts as a speed break. And speed breaks help slower, less talented players...In short, the difference between the best players and the worst players is structurally minimized in those sports.I guess the author of the above quotation and the one who quoted him haven't watched the Leeds United defense ripped apart by Thierry Henry's speed, or in fact, any football at all, ever...the existence of the off-side rule actually became advantageous to the speedy players! BTW, slower does not mean less talented...Should I name some talented but slow footballers? Oh, never mind.
Can one argue that football is "too boring on television", judging by the money television companies are willing to pay for the rights to broadcast matches in Europe? Is it fair to say that football is "too hard to describe on radio" considering a large number of football fans across Asia and South America follow the sport exclusively on the radio (and if football is so hard to broadcast on the radio, please spare your thoughts on the poor fans who follow cricket on the radio or ball-by-ball text update on the web) Even if Freddy Adu turns out to be the greatest player of all time, he might even take the US to a World Cup victory, he is not going to make football any more popular in the US.
"Why is soccer not a major professional sport in America?" - Football isn't popular in North American because it's not easily summarised in statistics. Americans might be satisfied with Shaq O'Neal being reduced to tables upon tables of statistics, but how can statistics capture the flicks and tricks of Roberto Baggio?
Reading the post I linked earlier, maybe it's just a wind-up...surely it's a wind-up???















Recent Comments