As mentioned previously, I take issue with the semantics of "Quantitative Easing". This is the subject matter for my latest Comment is Free article on the Guardian:
Although we are not monetising the government debt in the same way that
Zimbabwe has, it is hard to make any clear distinction. Yes, the Bank
of England is purchasing assets on the secondary market (not directly
from the Treasury). Yes, the Bank has every intention to mop up this
additional liquidity once the economy recovers, but "directness" and
"intentions" are largely semantic.
Recent Comments